OCR best-effort from ATIP image [requester] 293-294 of part1.
Record
Archived: June 3, 2025 10:32:03 AM
From: Immigration Representatives / Représentants immigration ([requester]: [requester]
To:
[requester] Immigration Representatives / Représentants immigration IRCC
Subject: [requester]
Importance: Normal
Sensitivity: None
Good day,
Thank you for contacting the Immigration Representatives [requester] note that this mailbox is intended for general guidance and does not provide responses to case-specific
inquiries but have provided the following information as guidance. Ifyou have case specific questions about a file, you
are encouraged to submit the IRCC Web form,
Please see our response to your question.
Please note that we cannot provide case specific instructions, the following is general guidance.
Normally, if a work permit has been issued to the client by IRCC, itis valid. It is possible for a temporary resident to hold
both a visitor record and a work permit at the same time, one permit does not invalidate the other. Often a visitor record
will include the condition that the holder may not work unless authorized to do so, and work permit provides the
authorization required to work.
Thank you kindly,
[requester]
From:
Sent: [requester]
To: Immigration Representatives / Représentants immigration (IRCC) <[requester email]>
Subject: [requester]
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Government of [requester] not click on links or open attachments
unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
ATTENTION: Ce courriel provient de l'extérieur du gouvernement du [requester] cliquez pas sur les liens et n'ouvrez pas
les piéces jointes sauf si vous reconnaissez l'expéditeur et sachez que le contenu est sir.
Good evening,
Scenario:
AWP extension was refused as the LMIA decision was still pending at the time of decision for the WP extension
application.
During restoration, the Applicant filed two restoration applications - one worker and another as a visitor.
cote
The restoration as Visitor was approved first and then the worker. Now, there is one VR and one WP issued,
My understanding is that WP is valid and the Applicant may work based on its conditions.
However, | am unsure since the WP was issued after the restoration as Visitor was approved.
| could only find guidelines on two applications scenario in maintained status but not for restoration (Iemporary
residents: Maintained status during processing (previously called implied status) - Canada.ca), so any help on this is
much appreciated.