ImmReps · ImmReps

[requester]

[requester]

This site does not collect a UCI, an application number, or an upload.

  • Free to read
  • No membership
  • Official releases
  • Independent of IRCC

Provenance

A-number
A-2025-13310
Date
Source type
ImmReps
Institution
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada
Package
A-2025-13310 Part 1 (pages 361-362)
Checked

Official page: IRCC: Access to information and privacy

OCR best-effort from ATIP image [requester] 361-362 of part1.

Record

Archived: June 3, 2025 10:35:25 AM From: Immigration Representatives / Représentants immigration (RCC) Sent: [requester] To: [requester] Immigration Representatives / Représentanis immigration IRCC) Subject: [requester] Importance: Normal Sensitivity: None Good day, Thank you for contacting the Immigration Representatives [requester] note that this mailbox is intended for general guidance and does not provide responses to case-specific inquiries but have provided the following information as guidance. Ifyou have case specific questions about a file, you are encouraged to submit the IRCC Web fortn. Please see our response to your question. Please note that we can not answer any case specific questions. If the PGWP extension was issued to the primary applicant prior to the January 21°* changes, the spouse may be eligible for the pre-January 21°* requirements listed here: Family members of foreign nationals authorized to work in high-skilled occupations (TEER 0, 1, 2 or 3) ~[R205(c){ii) ~ C41 and C46] — Canadian interest — International Mobility Program (1IMP) - Canada.ca If the primary applicant's extension was approved after January 21°, the spouse would not be eligible to be assessed against pre-Jan 21 rules We hope this information is of assistance. Thank you kindly, [requester] From: Sent: [requester] To: Immigration Representatives / Représentants immigration (IRC) <[IRCC Immigration Representatives mailbox]> Subject: [requester] CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Government of [requester] not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. ATTENTION: Ce courriel provient de I'extérieur du gouvernement du [requester] cliquez pas sur les liens et n'ouvrez pas les pices jointes sauf si vous reconnaissez I'expéditeur et sachez que le contenu est sir. Dear [requester], I am writing on behalf of a prospective client, with a question regarding their work permit and their spouse's 000365

eligibility. — : Client was issued a Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP) for 2 years in 2023, despite being eligible for 3 years, due to their passport's 2-year validity at the time. Since then, my client has renewed their passport and is now eligible to apply for the remaining duration of the work permit. Additionally, my client's spouse was issued a 2-year open work permit based on my client's 2-year [requester], my client now works in a Teer 2 job, and with the new regulations introduced last year, their spouse is no longer eligible for an open work permit in this role, Given that my client's work permit was approved before the implementation of these new rules, could you kindly clarify if their spouse would be exempt and eligible to apply for the remaining 1 year of the work permit? Thank you very much for your time and assistance. Look forward to your response.

0036s

Back to the library · IRCC records and ATIP