ImmReps · ImmReps

[requester]

[requester]

This site does not collect a UCI, an application number, or an upload.

  • Free to read
  • No membership
  • Official releases
  • Independent of IRCC

Provenance

A-number
A-2025-13310
Date
Source type
ImmReps
Institution
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada
Package
A-2025-13310 Part 2 (pages 21-22)
Checked

Official page: IRCC: Access to information and privacy

OCR best-effort from ATIP image [requester] 21-22 of part2.

Record

s.19(1) De Dre ereres, | Soto conace \omatondacosed under ie zens oration At

Archived: June 2, 2025 12:35:55 PM

From: Immigration Representatives / Représentants immigration (RCC

Sent: [requester]

To:

Ce: Immigration Representatives / Représentants immigration URCC)

Subject: [requester]

Importance: Normal

Sensitivity: None

Good day,

Thank you for contacting the Immigration Representatives Mailbox.

Please note that this mailbox is intended for general guidance and does not provide responses to case-specific

inquiries but have provided the following information as guidance. If you have case specific questions about a file, you

are encouraged to submit the [RCC Web form.

Please see our response to your question.

Response:

The 50% in class requirement is based on the length of the program, including credits earned from both in-person and

distance-learning courses, as confirmed by the eligible [requester] the course is delivered in person, then it is considered

in person/in class; if it is delivered online, then it is considered online. As such, if the co-op placement, health-care

practicums, or preceptorship are completed in-person, they should be considered in-class.

Officers rely on documents provided to applicants by designated learning institutions, such as: Letter of Completion of

[requester], and Transcript, and applicants are responsible to provide sufficient documentation to satisfy an officer

that they meet the requirements.

ek

Thank you kindly, [requester] De:

Envoyé: [requester]

A: Immigration Representatives / Représentants immigration (IRCC) <IRCC.immigrationRepresentatives

Representantsimmigration. [IRCC institutional email]>

Objet: [requester]

Good day,

lam writing to seek clarification regarding the classification of hybrid course delivery in relation to Immigration,

Refugees, and Citizenship Canada (IRCC)’s study permit and Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP) eligibility

requirements.

Att ne offer three primary modes of course delivery: online, hybrid, and face-to-face/in-person.

Hybrid learning combines both an in-person component and an online component, enabling students to engage with

course material through a flexible blend of classroom-based and virtual instruction.

Specifically, we would like to confirm whether hybrid courses, given their partial in-person delivery, are classified as “in-

class” courses for the purposes of IRCC policies related to study permits and PGWP eligibility. This clarification is 001208

8.19(1) De Dre ereres, | Soto conace \omatondacosed under ie zens oration At

particularly important for international students who rely on accurate interpretations of IRCC’s guidelines to ensure compliance with study permit conditions and future eligibility for the PGWP program.

values IRCC’s commitment to supporting international students and ensuring clarity in policy interpretation. We hope this inquiry will assist in providing our institution and students with clear guidance on how hybrid courses are considered under the current framework. We appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to your response. Should you require any additional information or documentation, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your time and support. [NAME REDACTED]

Back to the library · IRCC records and ATIP