OCR best-effort from ATIP image [requester] 597-598 of part2.
Record
On [requester] 1st, 2025 at 9:14 [requester] / Représentants immigration wrote:
[requester] order to properly assist you, may you please provide the following information
‘+ Please provide the case-specific information that your first question is based on. See highlighted
section in the email below.
Thank you kindly,
[requester]
From:
Sent: [requester]
To: Immigration Representatives / Représentants immigration (IRCC) <[requester email]>
Subject: [requester]
[requester] specific questions for In Canada TRP +OWP holders - in these case these are Ukrainian nationals.
TRP Operational instructions used for this question
hitos:/hwwu.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/oublications-manuals/operational-
oot78s
$.19(1) hid falioeedcetl cums
bulletins-manuals/temporary-residents/permits/validity-conditions-cancellation htm! “errant
Conditions and obligations
\cbpatOTRP holders must
+ leave Canada before the TRP’s expiry date or upon cancellation of their TRP by an officer
+ apply for a subsequent TRP before the expiry of their TRP if they want to maintain their
temporary resident status in Canada (for in-Canada cases only)
Question 1
If client's first TRP was not cancelled officially and client already has a new postCUAET open work permit
beyond the date of set TRP(+6 months for a duration of the passport) and not connected to TRP in any way-
this means status in Canada was maintained and TRP was rectified? We challenged a decision of the
post-CUAET OWP withdrawal with recommendation to submit a subsequent TRP, when client was
no longer inadmissible. We won the reconsideration and were granted a Post-CUAET work permit
for a duration of the passport. No need to apply for a new TRP in the future? first TRP is now expired
Question 2:
for a different CUAET client, for a subsequent TRP+OWP submission before the expiry of the first TRP+OWP
and received by IRC on paper before expiration of the first TRP+OWP - will the status be maintained in
Canada? Will client be considered legally authorized to continue working in Canada in this particular case?
Thank you
oos7ee