Glossary · How a court reads an officer decision. Not a citizenship trivia card.

Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov

Practice slang: Vavilov

Reasonableness looks for justification, transparency, and intelligibility. It is not a predicted Federal Court win.

On the official record

• The official case is Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65.
• The reasonableness frame asks whether the decision shows justification, transparency, and intelligibility, and whether the outcome is defensible on the facts and the law.
• Use that frame to read why an officer decided. That is the practice use of the name.

Common mix-ups

• Not a promise of approval.
• Not a predicted Federal Court win and not a win-rate card.
• Not a judicial-review how-to.
• A web-form reconsideration is not an appeal.

Confirm on the official page

Start here: Lexum: Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov.

The catch

Read the reasons you have. A web form does not turn a refusal into an appeal. This site does not file court papers.

What people mix up

The holding is the reasonableness frame, not the citizenship trivia of the facts. A web-form reconsideration is not an appeal.

Related

PFL · Web form · ATIP

Back to the glossary